🔗 Share this article Families' Distress Regarding Shoreline Erosion Endangering Norfolk Graves Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones. An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades. A newly published study on the issue details a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to move forward. “At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.” Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated. Haunted by the Past One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard. “You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.” “I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.” A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril Along the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved. “It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.” She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.” Seeking Solutions and Clarity An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried. Some are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is drawing near. “The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.” A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.” It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.” “There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each community.” The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.